THE THINGS YOU LEARN
Erik,
Remember during game 3 of the Cubs/Padres contest we were trying to figure out what a slugging average is? Well, I found a formal definition, which meant nothing to me until I pencilled it out. Here's how it works:
That sounds all well and good, but for a math-addled loser like me, it's meaningless. But here's what it looks like when you compare two players with entirely different at-bat experiences in a single game.
In the example above, Joe gets four hits, totalling 10 bases, divided by 4 at bats, for an improbably high SLG. Bob is at bat once, but hits a home run, giving him a significantly higher SLG. The SLG is relatively unforgiving and rewards only high extra bases: Bob performed fewer times and probably yielded fewer runs, but Joe had more chances at bat. How might the figures have changed if each had been at bat only once, or 4 times?
In this example, Joe has 4 hits worth 6 bases, three of them "only" singles, but is at bat 8 times, lowering his overall SLG. Bob is at bat only twice, but gets two triples, which gives him 6 bases, proving he's a more effective batter than Joe. Interesting stuff, eh?
Remember during game 3 of the Cubs/Padres contest we were trying to figure out what a slugging average is? Well, I found a formal definition, which meant nothing to me until I pencilled it out. Here's how it works:
Slugging percentage is a statistical measure of a batter's effectiveness in making extra-base hits. A single is worth one base; a double, two; a triple, three; and a home run, four. Slugging percentage is total bases divided by at-bats.
That sounds all well and good, but for a math-addled loser like me, it's meaningless. But here's what it looks like when you compare two players with entirely different at-bat experiences in a single game.
Game 1 | ||
Joe Batter | Bob Hitter | |
Singles | 1(=1) | 0 |
Doubles | 1(=2) | 0 |
Triples | 1(=3) | 0 |
Home Runs | 1(=4) | 1(=4) |
At Bats | 4 | 1 |
SLG | 2.500 | 4.000 |
In the example above, Joe gets four hits, totalling 10 bases, divided by 4 at bats, for an improbably high SLG. Bob is at bat once, but hits a home run, giving him a significantly higher SLG. The SLG is relatively unforgiving and rewards only high extra bases: Bob performed fewer times and probably yielded fewer runs, but Joe had more chances at bat. How might the figures have changed if each had been at bat only once, or 4 times?
Game 2 | ||
Joe Batter | Bob Hitter | |
Singles | 3(=3) | 0 |
Doubles | 0 | 0 |
Triples | 1(=3) | 2(=6) |
Home Runs | 0 | 0 |
At Bats | 8 | 2 |
SLG | 0.750 | 3.000 |
In this example, Joe has 4 hits worth 6 bases, three of them "only" singles, but is at bat 8 times, lowering his overall SLG. Bob is at bat only twice, but gets two triples, which gives him 6 bases, proving he's a more effective batter than Joe. Interesting stuff, eh?
1 Comments:
Umm... what's math?
By
Adam Albrecht, at 10:49 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home